Tuesday, January 31, 2012
Australian Adventure: Log 2
Tuesday, September 20, 2011
Review: 2011 Toyota 4Runner
While
all the 4Runners competitors, minus the Nissan Pathfinder, have reaped the
rewards of an all-new platform underneath them, the 4Runner has failed to
compete in terms of on road handling and performance. However, in the fuel
efficiency department, the 4Runner is only at a disadvantage on the highway,
matching its rivals in town. The bold new look that was ushered in last year
along with a lower ride height, has made improvements however the old 4Runner
still feels like a truck and not a sedan when running errands around town.
I
took the 4Runner Trail Edition to the Whipsaw Trail to find out just how good
the 4Runner could handle the great outdoors. It didn’t take long to find just
about every condition one could hope to find off-road. Dusty gravel, rutted
dirt, rock crawling, deep mud and even snow covered the first 20 km of the
trail. For the majority of the trail, 2WD would suffice; however, once the road
began to climb into the back country, 4WD-high would need to be called upon. Thankfully
the Trail Edition came with a manual transfercase shifter instead of the rather
irritating dash mounted electric dial.
Despite
all the cool features that make you look like a star negotiating slippery
situations, a couple weaknesses showed themselves when the going got rough. To
help give the 4Runner competitive fuel efficiency numbers, the ride height is a
little low for an off-roader, a situation made even worse by the standard
running boards which are nothing more than food to decent sized rock, as I
found out. Then when we reached some rutted out mud, the tires showed their
worth, and I’m guessing they don’t cost Toyota much. On dry surfaces, the 4WD
makes up for the tires weak grip levels, however, in the mud, the treads
clogged easily and lateral traction meant I had several close calls when the
truck slipped off the high ground into the ruts.Thursday, September 1, 2011
Trail Report: Whipsaw
History: Farewell B
It was in this era that also saw Mazda’s first truck
cooperation agreement with Ford, which would see the new B-1800 be rebadged as
a Ford Courier. Ford was in need of small truck to combat the influx of small
Japanese pickups like the Toyota, Isuzu and Datsun. The Courier was produced by
Mazda in Japan and imported into the US minus the rear bed to combat tariffs. With the new 1.8L engine increasing
torque to 92 lb-ft, the Courier/B-1800 had an impressive 1,400 lb load
capability combined with a cheaper price tag than the F-100. The only real
difference between the Mazda and Ford variants were the badging on the tailgate
and hood, while the Courier had a unique grille to mimic that of the F-100.
1978 would see another generation of the B-series created,
this time the truck got the full treatment with an all-new 80’s body design and
the usual increase in displacement to 2.0L, however this time with the
introduction of fuel injection. Soon after, one of the most popular versions,
the aforementioned B-2200 and B-2600 would be introduced in 1985. This marked
the height of small truck production, and the B-series saw a whole host of both
body and drivetrain upgrades. The B-2000, became the B-2200, then B-2600 with
the later producing 121 hp. The body was modernized with plastic bumpers;
upgraded grille and headlight assemblies while part time 4WD could now be had
for the first time. Customers now also had the choice of a long box or a king
cab option on their vehicles. The B-series was sold in North America in this
guise for well over a decade, from 1985 to 1998, and while the Courier was
still based off the B-series platform, it was not offered in North America, as
Ford had now created the Ranger for itself.
In its new North American cloths, the B-series not only
received much larger engine packages, but its size grew exponentially to meet
the North American needs. The choice of a 2.3L (B-2300) or 4.0L (B-4000)
engines were now mated to either rear-wheel-drive, or optional 4WD with a dash
mounted switch. Several of these new 4WD’s were now on par with the more
popular Toyota and Nissan trucks in terms of off-road modifications and
capabilities. However, with Ford now calling the shots, the only improvements
made to the vehicles over their 12-year lifespan was little more than the
addition of trim options. As a result, both the Ranger and B-series began to
loose favour in a market that saw an every increasing move towards larger
full-size trucks, as those trucks reaped the rewards of increased attention,
allowing automakers to sell them for nearly as cheaply.Review: 2011 Ford Explorer
The new design is quite an eye catcher if I do say so
myself, and sports some distinctly Land Roverish touches that really add to the
refinement of the vehicle. Inside the same can be said as a stylish interior
design is matched with high quality soft touch materials, while what few
buttons there are, give off a very luxurious feel and actuation. However, the
coolness factor gets cranked to 11 with both the gauge cluster and center stack
satnav, entertainment and HVAC centre.
Along with the cool displays the Explorer has a mass of new
drive technology. The list of control system acronyms for the Explorer is large
enough to make an Infiniti blush. The Explorer has benefited with a heavy
influx of shared technology that has been developed with the specialists
expertise of out-going partners Volvo and Land Rover, with excellent safety and
off-road abilities.
So, how does it all work in the real world, on roads slick
with packed ice? With our tester wrapped with Continental ice tires driving in
the standard surface setting already gives the driver a confident feeling on
snow and ice as the Explorer is well planted and turns in well. With the multi-surface
control set to “Sand” the explorer starts to get frisky as the computers start
to allow the wheels to spin up, and the vehicle is allowed to slid around a
little bit before traction and stability programs step in. In “Snow” mode,
throttle response is cut and the traction and stability programs are working at
the hardest to keep the vehicle on the straight and narrow. The result is a
phenomenal amount of grip on even the slipperiest of surfaces.Trail Report: A Rubicon in the Moab
Monday, January 17, 2011
History: Military Ruggedness for the Average Man
In 1946, Dodge introduced the Power Wagon to showrooms for the first time, giving the public access to rugged wartime machinery. Based on the 126-inch wheelbase, three-quarter ton military chassis, the civilian Power Wagon featured a purpose built 8-foot all-steel welded box with high 20-inch tall sides for maximum cargo carrying ability. It featured a 230 cubic-inch flat head six cylinder engine rated at a massive 78 hp, however, for those who owned them, the flathead was tough, cheap to fix and lasted forever. Mated to the 230 was a 4-speed gearbox and 2-speed transfer case with an interior shift lever. The military driveline was carried over to the Power Wagon, using the transfer case from the WC 63 6x6, however the low range gearing was changed from 1.5 to 1.96. Like many military based vehicles, the Power Wagon had a Power Take Off (PTO) feature that directed engine power to the front and rear bumpers, capable of powering auxiliary equipment. A big plus with farmers, miners and forestry men. The one-ton rated Power Wagon's maximum GVW rating was 8,700 pounds. Its maximum payload was 3,000-pounds, but more important to owners was its 2,000-pound limit for off-road conditions. The truck also featured military non-directional tires, as there were no other high traction tires available at that time.
Safety and emissions rules finally killed the Power Wagon in the States in 1968 as it was deemed too expensive to reverse-engineer the Slant 6 into the engine bay. A total of 95,145 WDX-WM300 Power Wagons were sold between 1945-1968. Domestic production would shut down, although exports continued to roll out until 1978. However, that would not be the end of the Power Wagon story. The truck was so popular and such a success that the name would live on in several versions of Dodges 4x4 pickups.Tuesday, August 24, 2010
Review: Return of the Chief
Mopar Nukizer
Thursday, February 11, 2010
History: The Original

In 1940 the world was erupting into war. At this time America was still sitting on the sidelines, however, Germany was about to start sinking American merchant vessels moving resources to Britain. Also, the Japanese were about to overrun American held Philippines, while pressure from allied countries urging the Americans to get in the game made it clear that the US couldn't stave off conflict much longer. The US Army at this time was still using the aged Ford Model-T as their General Purpose (GP) vehicles. It was clear that a new vehicle would be needed for the coming war that would require a highly mechanized force.
In June 1940, the U.S. military informed automakers that it was looking for a “light reconnaissance vehicle.” The Army invited 135 manufacturers to bid on production and developed a lengthy specification list. They wanted a vehicle with a 600-lb load capacity with a wheelbase less than 75-inches, a height less than 36-inches, a gross weight below 1,300-lb, a fold down windshield, three bucket seats and blackout driving lights. But most importantly, this vehicle needed to have a two-speed transfer case and four-wheel-drive. Only three manufacturers answered the call, Bantam, Ford and a newly reorganized company called Willys-Overland.

Willys-Overland was founded by John North Willys who bought Overland Automotive from the Standard Wheel Company back in 1908, then renamed the company Willys-Overland. During this time Willys began buying up several automotive companies to the point that they had become the second largest automaker in the US by 1918, behind Ford. However, with the great depression the company fell into bankruptcy. By 1936, they had sold off all their acquisitions to become a viable automaker once again when the Army came calling.
In the summer of 1940, Willy's along with Ford and Bantam got approval to build 7 test examples of their respective designs. The Willys prototype, named the Quad, was initially thought to be too heavy. For a second round of field testing, the Government released Bantams blueprints to both Willys and Ford sighting that Bantam did not have the resources for war-time mass production. As a result Willys incorporated several of the Bantams designs in the new Quad and the engineers stripped out all the weight they could find. Bolts were cut, sheet metal thinned and ten pounds of paint was taken off. When weighed, they had seven ounces to spare, and renamed it the “MA” for “Military" model "A." Fords prototype, the Pygmy, also benefited from the release of Bantams designs. As a result, 1,500 examples of each were built for field testing purposes.

However, by this time, the threat of war was very real, and the Army still didn't have a standardized vehicle. At the time the MA was considered more attractive mostly due to its more powerful engine. And so the War Department hastily made the decision to go with the Willys bid, but wanted all the best bits of the Ford and Bantam incorporated into the MA. With the winning bid in hand, Willys complied, modified the MA with the desirable parts from Ford and Bantam and re-designated it the MB.
While the 4,500 field test prototypes where shipped to Russia and Britain as part of the lend-lease program, Willys began production of the MB late in 1941 at the companies Toledo Factory in Ohio. After the attack on Pearl Harbor, America entered the war and production of the MB was increased to the point one vehicle was leaving the factory every minute and a half. Soon the US would find itself fighting in two theaters of war, so additional MB were built by Ford, under license to meet the demand, while Bantam was relegated to building trailers for the vehicles they had a major hand in designing. By the end of the war, Willys would produce more than 368,000 vehicles, and Ford an additional 277,000, for the Allied forces.

During the war, the MB was the lifeblood of the military, and its durability and performance proved without a doubt to be one of the major factors for winning the war. It could operate without strain from three to 60 miles per hour. It could handle a forty-degree slope, turn in a thirty foot circle, and tilt on a fifty-degree angle without tipping over. One soldier commented, “It does everything. It goes everywhere. It's as faithful as a dog, strong as a mule, and as agile as a goat. It constantly carries twice what it was designed for, and keeps on going.”
During its service in the war, the MB picked up a nick name given to it by the soldiers that drover it. Troops began calling the MB the Jeep. There is no definitive evidence as to how the name came about, but the more popular story is that when “GP” was slurred by soldiers, it sounded like they were saying jeep. Another story, says the name came from a character in the Popeye cartoon.
Willys trademarked the “Jeep” name after the war and planned to turn the vehicle into an off-road utility vehicle for the farm. As soldiers returned home from overseas, finding customers who respected the abilities of the Jeep would not be a problem. The first civilian Jeep vehicle, the CJ-2A, was produced in 1945. Willys advertisements marketed the Jeep as a work vehicle for farmers and construction workers. It came with a tailgate, side-mounted spare tire, larger headlights, an external fuel cap and many more items that its military predecessors did not include.

The CJ would continue to evolve over the years while Willys added several other versions based on the same platform. Willys came out with a delivery panel van in 1946, a one-ton pick-up version was conceived in 1947 along with a woody wagon. In 1956, a cab-over commercial truck was designed on a CJ-5 platform. Designated the FC-170, standing for “Forward Control,” due to its seating position over the front wheels for added cargo space.
Jeeps line of 4WD vehicles would become ever more popular over the years. The original little army jeep would transform into the CJ then the Wrangler. It has survived five corporate ownership changes to become the most recognizable 4WD brand. Today, the Wrangler Rubicon represents the best out-of-the-box all-terrain vehicle available on the market in North America. In it's military life, the MB would evolve into the M-38, then in 1981, the US military decided that after serving in three major wars, the little Jeep was obsolete. AM General won the contract to replace the jeep with their High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle, HMMWV for short. Ironically, like the Jeep back in the forties, HMMWV when slurred by an American soldier sounds like “Humvee,” and thus torch was passed to start a new era in all terrain mobility.








