Great Drives: Racing the Sun for Ice

About The Route

Best time to Go: Weekdays from April to October

Places To Stop: Two magnificent glaciers at either end of the route, other than this, just enjoy the epic journey between the two.

Total Distance:  31 km

Route: Starting point is the Fox Glacier, 43°29′21″S 170°02′19″E, where highway 6 winds drivers north through thick lush rain forests, over a mountain range that separates the two glaciers, to finishing at the foot of Franz Josef Glacier, 43°26′13″S 170°10′32″E.

Road Type: Smooth narrow tarmac road.

Warnings: Highly traveled road in January and February with an onslaught of oncoming tour buses. Watch for suicidal Possums, epic rainfall and great masses of hungry sand fly's. (like mosquitoes, but twice as itchy)

Review:

For our last drive in New Zealand, we found ourselves rushing to the west coast of the south island to catch a glimpse of one of two large glaciers, the Fox Glacier or the Franz Josef Glacier just to the north. We spent a little more time than we had hoped on the run over the Southern Alps to get to the coast, so daylight hours were running thin.

With the sun low on the water, we pulled into the small village of Fox Glacier. A short run up the valley, and we came upon the open parking lot for the trailhead that leads to the glacier. To our dismay, the trail was blocked with a sign proclaiming, "trail closed by washout." A week before our arrival, the south island had taken an epic beating, as storm fronts hit the coast for nearly three straight weeks. The resulting run-off of rainwater flooded several valleys in the region, and in this case, destroyed the trail leading to the glacier. All I could see was a small out cropping several kilometre’s away. A snap decision, I chose to push for Franz Josef, hopeful we could get there before darkness.

Back into our trusty BaseJumper 2 Campervan, I shot back to the #6 and turned north, aiming straight for the mountainous range that was nestled between Fox and Franz Josef. Of course in New Zealand, if you see hills, the road is going to get good, and good it got; really good.

With the small village of Fox Glacier right up against the base of this range, we ran smack into steep winding roads right off the bat. Now most of the Great Drives have consisted of great mountain pass crossings with impressive altitude changes that are accounted in thousands of metres. This range however, was only an outcropping of the Alps, with peaks only 800-metres tall. The road itself only reached a maximum of 400-metres above sea level. That didn’t mater however, as the road rollercoastered between 300 and 400 metres three times, climbing and plunging into two river valleys mid range. The rugged nature of the terrain greeted me with an extravagant collection of tight narrow curves, that when matched to the undulations, created a magnificently challenging bit of road. It just kept hitting me with corner after corner of winding glory. It seemed like the steering wheel was in perpetual motion, never getting a break, along with my forearms.

However the cherry on top was the lushness of the Kiwi rain forest that crept right to the roadside. Doing its best to hide the rocky ridges and gorges under a canopy of deep green fern trees, Palm trees and moss; the rainforest provided a majestic atmosphere. Driving this road was like going on a hike up into the coastal BC mountains with the Nurburgring acting as the trail. Despite wheeling around a big campervan with pots and cutlery rattling around in the back, I was in driving bliss. One day I will have to return to this road, armed with something much smaller and sportier.

Unfortunately, I did not get to properly soak in the joys of driving this road, as I was on a mission, and the sun was now creeping level with ocean, as I soon found out as I rounded a couple sharp hairpins, breaking out onto the flood plain of the Franz Josef. Wheeling right at the park turnoff, I rush up an equally impressive park road lining the river leading to the glacier. With tourists filing out of the hiking trails leading to the glacier, we throw the big campervan into a parking spot, grab our camping headlights and leap from the van in a sprint into the forest, like the touristy fools we were, eager for a close up glimpse of the Franz Josef.

With the sun down and only just enough light to see the gleaming blue and white ice of the Franz Josef, we arrived to the lookout-point exhausted and sweaty. However, for the five minutes we had to take in the beauty of the glacier before all went black, the sight was well worth the battle I fought against the sun and this magnificent road. The glacier and the road connecting it to its sister Fox Glacier proved an epic experience in an already impressive part of the world.

Review: 2011 Toyota Highlander

Toyota are calling the 2011 Highlander changes a mid-cycle refresh, something every manufacturer does to vehicles that have been on the market for a while, to spark some life and interest into them to once again. However, the sheer amount of work that has gone into the 2011 Highlander could easily qualify as an all-new model redesign, with heavy cosmetic and aerodynamic changes to the body, increased capacity and winter heating has been built into the hybrid system while an entirely new engine now powers the V-6 powered Highlanders. While most mid-cycle changes usually consist of new trim levels, or minor fascia work, Toyota’s all out assault on the Highlander has changed the entire character of this mid-sized crossover.

Lets start with the most obvious changes, the new look. is refreshing, and has now confirmed the Highlander is the younger brother of the 4Runner gaining a similar family appearance. The new menacingly styled headlights and grille is refreshing bit of spice to Toyota’s usual mass appeal design recipe. Matched with slightly massaged front and rear bumpers, the new Highlander barely resembles the timid creature that we’ve become used to. Along with these changes, the rocker panels and front sheet metal have also been redesigned to channel air more efficiently around the vehicle in a never ending battle to lower the aerodynamic co-efficient.

There are also big changes under the skin. Gone is the 3.3L V-6 that was normally found in the Highlander, replaced by a quite useful 270-horsepower 3.5L V-6. The Hybrid features upgraded Toyota Hybrid Synergy Drive technology built around a Atkinson cycle version of the 3.5L V-6 and an enhanced electrical motor/generator system, both of which deliver 10% better fuel efficiency. With this addition of three electric motors (one for charging, one powering front wheels, one powering rear wheels) the Highlander Hybrid now boasts a combined horsepower rating of 280, with push button electric-only drive capability, providing the batteries are well charged.

New this year, Toyota has added an Exhaust Gas Re-circulation and Exhaust Heat Recovery systems to the hybrid. The first re-circulates spent exhaust gasses to lower exhaust gas temperatures, which in turn minimizes the need for fuel enrichment. The benefit is a significant reduction of fuel consumption, especially during high-load driving and improved fuel efficiency. The Heat Recovery System recovers exhaust heat to quickly raise coolant temperature during warm-up. This allows the engine to warm up faster thereby, allowing it to shut off for EV driving a full 15-minutes sooner; a handy feature for short winter commutes.

Inside, the dash and door panels are still a sea of hard plastic and don’t possess the most inspiring of designs, however a strip of felt on the door panel did add a small touch of luxury. While the materials may seem cheap, the controls are very simple and easy to use as well as the dash layout. Knobs and buttons have a good solid feel and are extra large just incase you forget where they are. Both the steering and seats have a good range of adjustability to find the optimal position for just about any size.

Toyota have done a masterful packaging job with the back of this SUV, as personal space should be taken up by fold flat seating, fuel tanks, full size spare, and those extra batteries that need to go somewhere. This year every Highlander comes standard with 7-passenger seating thanks to a 50/50 split pop-up third row, so space should be hard to find. Now with many mid-sized utes, these seats are all but useless to anyone north of a toddlers size anyways, and while at first I thought the same of the Highlanders third row, I quickly changed my tune after crawling back there. There is ample headspace for average sized adults and with the second row pushed forwards slightly, legroom is also kind for short trips. However, if there is only five coming along, the rear passengers are treated to a massive amount of space with the 3^rd row folded flat.

On the road, the Hybrid drove straight and true, however steering is very light and void of any real feel for the road. Like most Toyota’s, the Highlander is engineered for a soft smooth ride, however, despite the AWD system, it’s not likely many of these will ever see off-road duty, so I’d personally like to see the suspension firmed up a bit to give a better feel of the road and help the noticeable body roll. What did get me excited was the vehicles fuel efficiency. The Hybrid Synergy Drive worked wonders on the highway, scoring an incredible 7.1L/100km fuel efficiency rating on a 165-km drive, a number besting several compact cars, not to mention Toyota’s own numbers as its rated at 7.3L/100km. However I was not able to get much urban driving in, but Toyota rates the Hybrid at 6.6/100km, an easy figure to match with the help of the EV mode. For the non-hybrid Highlander, expect to see a highway rating of 7.3L/100km, and 10.4L/100km in the city.

All in all, the 2011 Highlander was a pleasant surprise as both the use of interior space and incredible fuel efficiency topped any expectations I previously held for the vehicle. While I’m not a supporter of SUV or CUV vehicles, the new Highlander will surely make prospective station wagon buyers think twice. As of time of writing, Toyota has not yet revealed pricing on the Highlanders, so check out Toyota.ca to get the latest.

SPECIFICATIONS:

Base Price (MSRP): TBA

Price as Tested: TBA

Type: 7-passenger Crossover

Layout: Front engine, AWD, Hybrid assist

Engine: 3.5L V-6 with Electric assist

Horsepower: 280 combined

Torque: 215 combined

Transmission: Electronically Controlled Continuously Variable Transmission (ECVT)

Brakes: Four-wheel discs with regenerative braking

Cargo Capacity: 2,660L seats folded, 290L all seats up

Fuel Economy (L/100km): 6.6L city, 7.3L highway 

Review: Return of the Chief

There are big movements afoot at Chrysler these days. The company that filed for bankruptcy protection just last year, held a sense of uncertainty and gloom over the pentastar brands. However, they are about to break that trend with a plethora of exciting new vehicles.

The first vehicle to receive the increased attention is the 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee. Billed as a luxury off-roader, the Cherokee is another SUV that tries to mix top levels of luxury into a vehicle capable of getting itself dirty where ever the driver may care to take it. Many have failed in this attempt, and indeed, the last generation Grand Cherokee lacked a quality interior, while the drive was still very much soft-road oriented to to do battle with other high-end SUV's.

That changes for the 2011 model year, however. The new Grand Cherokee gets a bold new look, vastly improved interior design, and with help from an old elegance with Daimler, it now has a body stiff enough to take on even the most expensive in the business.

While exterior received a fair amount of attention, it was not the weak point of the outgoing model. The interior of the 2010 lacked any real luxury appointments and was of a design that seamed to age in front of your eye's. Jeep put a full court press into updating the interior to a higher standard. A sharp new design is complemented by premium soft-touch materials. However, it's the little details that make the Cherokee's interior truly great. Door storage bins are tapered, chrome vent handles have a soft rubber grip, while aluminum scuff slats line the rear cargo area add an extra touch of class. Drivers are also offered several feature upgrades including real wood and leather, heated steering wheel, heated and ventilated front seats, heated rear seats, four-way power lumbar controls, rain-sensitive wipers, Keyless Enter-N-Go, ParkView rear back-up camera and power tilt/telescoping steering column with memory. It's a coming together of hundreds of little insignificant details that make the interior of the Grand Cherokee a such a great place to spend your time.

Many will fondly remember the diesel version of the Cherokee that proved to be quite popular that offered increased off-road, towing and fuel efficiency abilities over the gasoline counterparts. As of yet there is no diesel version coming to Canada, however,  Jeep are quick to point out that the all-new flexible-fuel, 3.6L Pentastar V-6  gets better fuel efficiency than the outgoing diesel. The Pentastar engine features an 11 percent improvement in fuel economy, delivering up to 10.2 L/100km, Variable-valve Timing, 290 hp and 260 lb.-ft. Of course those that want a little more rumble under the right foot can opt for the 5.7L HEMI V-8 in the top three trim levels.

Moving our way down the driveline, Jeep has offered up three different 4x4 options to choose from. The Quadra-Trac I, Quadra-Trac II and the Quadra-Drive II. Quadra-Trac I is a full-time AWD single speed transfer case with a 50/50 torque split offered on the base V-6. Quadra-Trac II is an electronically controlled two-speed unit that is available with a 2.72 low range ratio and Selec-Terrain, which allows the driver to choose from five different surface conditions. Auto is designated for everyday driving. Snow, is tuned to minimize oversteer and maximizes traction. Sport reduces traction control and gives a RWD feel. Sand/Mud maximizes traction and allows for additional wheel slip. Finally Rock is available in 4-Low and activates hill descent.

Along with the drivetrain layouts, Jeep is now offering Quadra-Lift, which implements air springs in place of the regular coil springs found on the base V-6. Controlled with the Selec-Terrain or manually, Quadra-Lift allows the Cherokee to be lowered nearly 4 cm for entry and exit, will lower 1.3 cm for performance driving or can raise the Cherokee 3.3 cm in off-road I, or 6.6 cm in off-road II. In off-road II, the Cherokee reaches a top ground clearance of 21.8 cm, for off-road duties.

So now that we have the technicals out of the way, lets get into the drive. I chose the base Laredo as my first vehicle as this comes standard with the all-new Pentastar V-6. Smooth is the optimum word here, as both the engine and the ride were revelation of quality. The V-6 pulled strong throughout the power-band and really was as efficient as Jeep promised. Having to settle for the base engine never seemed so good, in fact I actually preferred it over the rather brutish and guzzling HEMI counterpart. My only complaint was with the aging 5-speed automatic transmission, which lost a lot of rpm on upshifts and struggled to find the right gear going up hills. This should be rectified with Chrysler just signing a deal to build the ZF 8-speed automatic, that will likely make its way into the Cherokee in a few years time.

However, one of the most enduring factors that was left with me in driving the Cherokee was the increase in quality handling. The base Cherokee drove as smooth as a Lexus, and could likely give a BMW a run in the handling department. The strength of the new chassis is blatant, and really takes this vehicle into another level. The base V-6 was a joy to drive in the twisties, however, I found that the big V-8 with the Quadra-Lift suspension was much softer and moved around more than I would have liked. Were the base Cherokee made huge new strides in on-road abilities, the Quadra-Lift equipped V-8 reminded me of the older, softer Cherokee, one more suitable for those who intend to use it off-road

It is a Jeep after all, and Jeeps go anywhere. Don't let the flashy new disguise fool you, as this is one of the most capable luxury off-roaders going and is Trail Rated. Set loose in the Hollister Hills Recreational Area, we dragged the Cherokee up some impressive washouts and down steep sandy drops. Despite being equipped with all-season tires, the Cherokee upheld the brands recognitions for off-road excellence. For the four-wheeling gear-heads out there frothing at the mouth to know what type of numbers equate to in the off-road department, ground clearance is listed at 218 mm, with at 26.3-degree approach 26.5 departure angles and and a break-over of 18.8-degree with standard suspension. Opt for the air springs and those numbers change to 270 mm, 34.3-degrees, 29.3-degrees and 23.1-degrees.

The 2011 Grand Cherokee is currently being shipped to dealerships and will be available in four different trim levels. The base Laredo E which only comes with the Pentastar V-6 and starts at $37,995. The Laredo X upgrades interior features and offers the HEMI and Off-Road Group II as an option with Selec-Terrain and Quadra-Lift. The Limited comes standard with Quadra-Trac II, Selec-Terrain and HID headlamps and starts at $46,998 while the Overland tops the line with standard GPS, Quadra-Lift and 20-inch wheels. For a vehicle who's next closest rival is represented by the Land Rover Range Rover, the Cherokee represents a massive bang for buck in the luxury 4x4 segment.

Specifications:

MSRP: $37,995 - $49,995

Type: 5-door, 5-seat SUV

Layout: Front engine/4x4

Engine: 3.8L V-6/5.7L V-8

Power: 290/360

Torque: 260/390

Transmission: 5-speed automatic

Brakes: Ventilated discs (front and rear)

Fuel economy: 13.0 L/100km City; 8.9 L/100km Hwy/15.7 L/100km City; 10.6 L/100km Hwy

Review: BMW X6 ActiveHybrid

BMW have dived into yet another segment of the automotive field, that of the hybrid. They are not new to green motoring, as massive amounts of capital and R&D have been invested into the companies successful diesel vehicle lines, while all-electric versions of both BMW's and MINI's are currently undergoing consumer testing for future production. However, the power that a hybrid vehicle has in todays eco-fanatical market is a strong one, one they have now joined.

In typical BMW style, the first hybrid to adorn the spinning blue and white prop badge has a heavy dose of performance injected into the recipe. Hybrids are most often known to be overweight and underpowered vehicles, however the ActiveHybrid X6 is packing 480 hp and an earth moving 575 lb-ft of torque. The ActiveHybrid version of the X6 has made no sacrifices in the name of a eco-friendly monicker. It is exactly the same as the regular 4.4L V-8 powered X6, with the addition of a NiMH (nickel-metal hydride) battery pack located under the cargo area floor, some minor tuning and a hybrid electric propulsion system.

Like many hybrids, the X6 has to deal with the added weight of the extra hardware mounted on board. With all the standard luxuries that you expect with any BMW, the X6 balloons to 2,580 kg in weight, something that does present a handicap in several area's. One area is this has effected is the low speed electric only drive. With a good charge on the battery, the X6 can be driven lightly under purely electric power, up to 60 kmh. However, the added weight makes the technique of keeping as much load off the throttle a tough affair, and only the most patient drivers will be able to get the most out of the batteries charge.

The ActiveHybrid is considered a performance hybrid, however, a hybrids purpose is fuel efficiency. As BMW already have an industry leader in the form of the X5d, the X6 weight strikes once again, as I averaged 12.1L/100km in the X6, and 9.2L/100km in the X5d. As the X5 is by no means a slouch in the performance department as well and has the advantage of more cargo space, better visibility and by my accord, better looks than the X6.We may have ourselves an inter-brand rivalry building here.

While driving in the city may be a tricky affair, in terms of getting the most out of the electric drive, driving on the highway is an absolute pleasure. The steering is as direct and communicative as any BMW, and those seats are the best in the business. The acceleration potential of the X6 is something to behold despite the weight. The big raspy V-8 barks, the electrics spark to life and the big X6 effortlessly powers forward down the road to the surprise of unsuspecting  motorists. But there is a draw back with the X6's abilities. Like most luxury vehicles, the drivers sensation of speed is quite dulled, this matched with massive power, and with three different variables to distribute power, I found that the X6 would often gain up to 40 kmh of speed on the freeway without my knowing. The highly recommended heads-up display showing my speed in the windshield tipped me off to the situation just in time to rectify it before coming across a radar wielding officer.

Likewise, I was unhappy with the brake pedal. A brake pedal in hybrid vehicles is only used to tell an onboard computer how hard you want to brake, it then directs that information to both the regenerative braking system on the electric motors and the actual brakes themselves. As such, the brake pedal has zero feel and pourly connects the driver to the vehicle. It felt like there was a balloon stuck underneath the pedal. Also, I'm never a fan of the active brake force adjustments which changes the force of braking used.

There is no doubt about it, the ActiveHybrid X6 is an impressive bit of kit, and a great vehicle that proves hybrids can be exciting vehicles. However, with the quality of the X5d available for over $30,000 less then the ActiveHybrids $99,900 starting price, it may not be the right choice for those looking for the best fuel efficiency. The  ActiveHybrid will be attractive to those with an insatiable appetite for a high performance crossover, with the unique coupe look couple with the stigma of driving a hybrid. 

Review: Mini Cooper S Cabriolet

With the hardtop version of the Mini Cooper S being on the scene for quite a while now, we’ve all been waiting for the updated convertible version. While the new turbo powered 1.6L in the new car is much more efficient, I find I do miss the whine of the supercharged version that was still the used in the as of yet, original Mini Cooper S convertible. So with the added wait over its hard top brother, I hope to see good things with the new car.

 

Well here it is, the next generation Cooper s Convertible with a freshly updated chassis and a turbo bolted to the exhaust system, the new car mirrors the fresh good looks of the hardtop. Not that there was anything wrong with the old one in the first place. So lets start with the interior. You’ll find the same straight-up driving position as in the last model, and same great pedal arrangement to aid in crisp heal-toe downshifts. That big Speedo/radio gauge is back and bigger than ever, as it seems to be in a territorial war with the steering wheel. Another odd gauge was the timer next to the tach that would let you know how long the tops been down. Cheesy at first, I came to realize its usefulness with a red forehead.

 

As mentioned, the Convertible gets the same mill as the hardtop, a now more efficient 1.6L turbocharged marvel that keeps up to just about any thing that wants to have a go. Sporting direct injection and an impressive 172 hp, the Mini can leave the line with a 7.4 sec spring to 98 km/h, while producing a scant 5.7L/100km on the highway, once your nerves have cooled down.

 

However, controlling your nerves may be a monumental task, as this new drop top has the same playful and exuberant character about it as the hardtop. Hell, it’s a Mini, and Mini’s are meant to be driven by a driver who loves to have fun behind the wheel. That’s just what this car is, as every moment behind the wheel inspires the driver to find some twisties, and open‘er up. However, as a driving enthusiast, there is a problem when doing this, the evil chassis rigidity of a convertible car rears its ugly head.

 

And lets face it, the only real way to make a soft top handle like a hardtop is to weld the doors shut, but Mini have done the best they can to counter act the roofless body movement. With a reinforced floorpan, A-pillars and side-sills, the body has a torsional stiffness increase of 10%. The suspension is also sprung extremely tight, with very stiff dampening to aid in a solid feel. While it all works well to disguise the fact that a convertible just doesn’t have the torsional stiffness of a hardtop, the chassis movement and vibrations do get a bit annoying. That’s for me as a driving enthusiast, however the sun worshipers who love the look and playfulness of the Mini, will likely not even notice.

 

However, this brings us to another slightly annoying trait, and that’s the price. A base convertible S will set you back a $36,350, a hefty jump from the $29,900 asking price for the hardtop. Sir Alec would be rolling in his grave. While I do like the Cooper S convertible’s playful spirit and I really do miss a roofless night drive with only the stars to look at, I have to say I personally am much more at home in the hardtop.

 

Specs:

MSRP: $36,350

Price as tested: $40,017

Layout: Front Engine – Front Wheel Drive

Engine: 1.6L Turbo I-4

Transmission: 6-Speed Manual

HP: 172

Torque: 177

Brakes: Four wheel ventilated discs

Curb Weight: 1,295 kg

Towing Capacity: NA

0-100 km/h: 7.4 sec

Fuel Economy (city/hwy): 7.8/5.7L/100km

Comparison: Luxury SUV's Offroad

Sport Utility Vehicles. They are supposed to be all things to all people. Original examples evolved from 4WD vehicles that were capable of creating their own trail through rough terrain. Today, this segment has branched out into several different genres. The standard soccer mom SUV, the proper 4x4-geared SUV, the crossover and mini-SUV and finally, the luxury sport SUV.

 

This latter species is an odd one. Manufacturers who build these vehicles know that their wealthy owners will be much too scared of a little leftover winter sand on the road, let alone take them off-road. So the builders design these SUVs to handle like cars, and carve up tarmac corners instead of washed-out back roads. But they still build these luxury liners with AWD systems and even the most sports-oriented versions give the owner approach and departure angles in their spec sheets.

 

The whole train of thought behind an SUV is that these vehicles offer safety in adverse conditions. Many manufacturers also market these vehicles as passports to outdoor adventure, but will they actually survive in the wild? We got four different examples of these luxury SUVs and took them out into the great outdoors to see how they stand up against mother nature. Our trusty steeds in this experiment would be the Volvo XC90 R, BMW’s new diesel-powered X5, Infiniti’s FX50 and finally, the Land Rover LR3 HSE. All high-performance rides with the looks to match.

 

Infiniti FX50

Lets start with the highest performance version of these vehicles, the FX50. This is a truck that in reality is a high-performance sports car in SUV clothing. Its on-road abilities are truly amazing, and it could very likely make a couple of performance coupes look foolish on a track. However, the designs that make it a beast on the road should hinder the vehicle once the safety of tarmac is lost. The biggest weakness is the 21-inch wheels that are wrapped with 45-series all-season tires. When it comes to rough roads, this setup is a definite risk. Despite this, Infiniti lists the FX50’s approach and departure angles in the specs for the vehicle, and for a something so low to the ground (another hindrance in the back country) the angles are respectable.

 

The driving test proved the FX50 quite confident on gravel roads,  looking out for rocks and large potholes, and Nissan's great “RWD first” AWD system makes it a blast on clean winding gravel roads. It is clear that the suspension is tarmac oriented, so the FX50 does not feel like it is firmly planted on loose surfaces. If you decide to leave the beaten path, caution needs to be maintained, and only light off-road driving can be accomplished due to the vehicle's low ride height. Another problem we ran into was the strength of the centre differential. Under heavy load or when wheelspin began to be a factor, the centre viscous diff would overheat, leaving you with only RWD. Also, the absence of any underbody armour proves again that any off-roading in the FX50 should be kept to light terrain.

 

Volvo XC90 R

The XC90 is marketed much more to the adventurist than, say, the Infiniti or even the BMW. The name itself stands for Cross Country, so the ride height is higher, approach and departure angles are increased and there is even some skid plating mounted underneath, even if some is more for show. In terms of visibility and seating, the XC90 ranked top of our list. However, as Volvo prides itself on the on-road sportiness of the XC90, the 20-inch wheels mounted on our “R” version are risky, although our tester was set up with snow tires, giving us much more traction.

 

On the driving test, it had excellent driving characteristics on gravel roads, and the fear of damage from debris was not as high as the other vehicles, making for a more stress-free drive. It did tend to understeer when it got slippy. Off the beaten track, the XC90 proved remarkably confident despite its low height. The increased grip from tires and manoeuvrability of the XC itself had us heading into terrain we didn’t think was accessible. However, much like the FX50, the centre viscous diff proved to be a weak point as it, too, required cooling, leaving us with only FWD while in the field. All in all, we were quite impressed with the Swede, as it is capable of handling light-to-medium terrain, while being a sporty on-roader. Using the smaller 17-inch wheels available would make the XC an even more competent soft roader.

 

BMW X5 35d

BMW says that the X5 is just as good as handling a corner as the 3-series sedan. Having had an X5 on a racetrack, I can attest to this fact, as it is a force to be reckoned with. BMW has now released the turbo diesel version of the X5 in Canada, something I am ecstatic about as it now adds great fuel efficiency to the X5’s equation. But what about its off-road abilities? At 18 inches, the wheels are the smallest of the group and offer decent protection in a 55-series tire, which also turned out to be a snow tire on our tester. Like the Volvo, the X5 has some underbody protection, although its low plastic overhangs similar to the FX50 will have drivers keeping the approach and departure angles to a civilized level.

 

On our test drive, the Bimmer soaked up the gravel road with absolutely no problems, and remained neutral handling. It did have some of the stiff suspension float like the Infiniti produced. While the vehicle height had us on edge through the rough stuff, the Bimmer's low-range capability, and the strength of the diffs, meant that the drivetrain never experienced any problems no matter how sticky things got. While it was ideal to keep travel to mostly flat terrain, its capabilities were truly impressive, while the diesel always meant we had a good range of torque on demand.

 

Land Rover LR3 HSE

Now here is a special case. Land Rover has been the epitome of off-roading since the sixties, and the icon of any adventure expedition on any continent. With the Series Landies not in production, and very few Defenders making it to our shores, Land Rover has gone from farmyard worker to Military Recce vehicle, now ending up as a luxury vehicle driven by soccer moms and hockey players. So the question has to be, has Land Rover lost its off-road abilities that made the brand the most famous of any adventurer? NO!

 

While the LR3 looks more at home at the end of a red carpet, it still possesses the ability to get muddy. What makes it different from the others is its drivetrain. While the Volvo, BMW and Infiniti all use a standard clutch pack centre differential, the LR3 features a two-speed transfer case utilizing both high and low gearing, with locking centre, and optional locking rear, differentials. Land Rover has also added airbag suspension to raise the ride height for better ground clearance. Match this with a plethora of off-road-based electronics, and it is instantly apparent that Land Rover has not forgotten where it came from.

 

As you would expect, light and medium terrain come at ease with all these options. When it comes to hard terrain, the LR3 still remains competent, even if its limits are now being challenged. At this point, the same trouble of body overhangs and ground clearance begin to hang up the LR3. So, impressive off-road skill for such a luxury SUV to be sure. However, for these abilities, the Land Rover falls far behind the on-road abilities of the other three. 

 

Conclusion

After looking at four different luxury SUVs representing four different manufacturers built in four different countries, our conclusion may come as a bit of a surprise. The single biggest disadvantage to traveling off-road with these vehicles is the bodywork and tires. Taking these SUVs into the wild is like asking a painter to go to work in a tuxedo. You have to be willing to sacrifice scrapes down the doors and gouges in the bumpers, and if the size of the brakes permit, a smaller set of wheels and larger tires that will protect against punctures.

 

The truth of the matter is that for those who want to get out and explore the great outdoors, the terrain traveled is usually considered light if not just a gravel road. While the off-road capabilities of these vehicles are mostly medium-to-light, they are more than adequate for getting to 90 percent of the destinations that most outdoor enthusiasts desire. Obviously, if you are a dedicated wheeler, a more single-purpose, modified vehicle that won’t have you in tears when it rubs up against a tree, will be ideal. But for those who need to get back to work on Monday, and enjoy a luxury environment and sports car-like performance, then we found that a luxury SUV is well capable of doing it all.

 

 

The Specs

Infiniti FX50

Engine:  5.0L V8

Wheelbase/Track:  2,885/1,680 mm

Ground Clearance:  187 mm

Approach Angle:  28.8 degrees

Departure Angle: 20.9 degrees

Final Drive:  3.538

AWD System: Viscous Centre Differential-based full-time AWD

Curb Weight: 2,075 kg

Tires:  265/45R21

Electronic Aids: Only on-road safety aids

Price Base/As Tested:  $51,800 (FX35)/$59,900

 

 

 

Volvo XC90

Engine:  4.4L V8

Wheelbase/Track:  2,857/1,634 mm

Ground Clearance:  218 mm

Approach Angle:  28.0 degrees

Departure Angle: 25.0 degrees

Final Drive:  3.33

AWD System: Electronically-controlled multi-plate wet clutch-based full-time AWD

Curb Weight: 2,053 kg

Tires: 255/40R20

Electronic Aids: Only on-road safety

Price Base/As Tested: $48,595/$68,295

 

 

 

BMW X5 35d

Engine:  3.0L I6 Diesel

Wheelbase/Track:  2,933/1,650 mm

Ground Clearance:  210 mm

Approach Angle: 25.0 degrees

Departure Angle: 23.0 degrees

Final Drive:  4.44

AWD System: Electronically-controlled multi-plate wet clutch-based full-time AWD

Curb Weight: 2,370 kg

Tires:  255/55R18

Electronic Aids: Hill Descent Control

Price Base/As Tested:  $58,200/$62,200

 

 

 

Land Rover LR3 HSE

Engine:  4.4L V8

Wheelbase/Track:  2,885/1,613 mm

Ground Clearance:  240 mm

Approach Angle:  37.2 degrees

Departure Angle: 29.6 degrees

Final Drive:  3.73 – Transfer case Low/High: 2.93/1.00

AWD System: Two-speed electronic transfer gearbox, shift-on-the-fly capability with electronically-controlled variable-locking centre and rear differentials

Curb Weight: 2,629 kg

Tires: 255/55R19

Electronic Aids: Terrain Response System, Traction Control, Hill Descent Control, All-terrain dynamic stability control.

Price Base/As Tested:  $53,900/$64,200

Review: Lexus IS-F

The BMW M3. Back in the late 80’s it was the pioneer of the high-performance luxury sedan. It was the Hulk of the automotive world. A regular E30 3-Series was a sporty, good looking, fun to drive vehicle. However, someone ticked off the 3-Series and muscles tore out of its body, wings sprouted out, and a screaming 2.3L struck fear into anyone within earshot. Building such a beast could not go without retaliation however. Soon after, Mercedes introduced the 190E Evolution, also a muscle bound animal. The two locked horns in battle on streets, circuts and stages around the world.

 

Fast forward 20 years. BMW and Mercedes are still at each others throats, although they now have some competition. Audi’s manic RS4 can also be added to the list of horrifically fast saloons. As of late, Lexus has been competing with BMW’s several different levels although have never really stepped up to the plate with a truly high performace machine to rival the M3. Well those days are long gone. Let me introduce the IS-F, the bad boy of the IS series.

 

Like the original M3, Lexus has designed the IS-F to demand authority. Clear identifications that this is not just a IS-250, or 350 are clearly announced with an aggressive low and wide stance, massive wheels, and a pair of badass flare vents on the front fenders to offer extra cooling for the massive V8 shoehorned into the engine bay. There is no doubt about it, this car looks the business. But is its bit as bad as its bark.

 

Yes! With BMW, Mercedes and Audi all having large high revving V8’s, this can be a hard act to follow. No problem for Lexus, they stepped forward with a 5.0L high revver of their own, which slots in nicely between the Audi and Merc. Squeezed into the IS body, this mill propels the car forward with extreme violence. With TC off, be prepare to fight to keep everything straight, as gearshifts from 1^st to 2^nd and 2^nd to 3^rd will have the rear end waving to those you just left far behind. Even with the massive 20-inch rims wraped with 375/30 super sticky Michelin Pilot Sports.

In the handling department, this is a super tight car. The chassis, steering, shifting, suspension, brakes, everything about this car feels tight and firm like an athletes body conditioned for competition. Couple this with excellent seat positioning, the IS-F is extremely good at talking to the driver. The driver can feel every bit of what the car is doing through touch alone.

 

Coming into a corner at speed, (something hard not to do with this car) the IS-F turns in with an incredible amount of frontal grip. This car just will not understeer, however if you get too aggressive with it, be ready to catch the oversteer that will come barreling at you once the rear grip becomes too much.

 

Unfortunetly the flappy paddle gearbox takes away from the drivers envolvement in this car. Lexus see’s this gearbox as a crowning achievement of the IS-F, although I see things a little different. Now before all you statisticians out there email in with your hate mail, yes, a dual clutch automatic gearbox is faster than a manual. Specing out a dream car on paper will have this car looking quite attractive. However, for a true driving enthusiast who is actually going to get behind the wheel, it can be a bit of a handicap. Truth is, it does take control away from the driver, as well as the joy of a perfectly produced downshift. Eight speeds help fuel efficiency and allow you to always be in a good cornering gear, but its easy to get lost in the maze. More than a couple times I’ve come flying into corners and had to look down at the dash to see what gear I was currently at in the sequence of six downshifts. I’ve never really liked paddle shifters, and as this is the only option available for the IS-F, its left the first bad taste in my mouth.

 

The interior is quite civilized when compared to its muscle bound competition. The seats are not as aggressive, but still hold the driver in place nicely. The dash is pleasing to both the eye and the fingers as many functions are not as complicated as the Germans. Even the rear seats prvide a comfortable environment for terror striken passengers.

 

So at the end of the day, does the IS-F match up to its highly competitive rivals? This group of car are so evenly matched, that choosing a favourite is hard enough as it is, and now Lexus throws in a wild card. Well let me tell you that Lexus got it right, in a big way. It slots nicely in with the entire crowd and holds position like it has been there the whole time.

 

 

Specifications:

Engine: 5.0L V8

Power: 414 hp, 375 lb.ft.

Weight: 1,750 kg

Transmission: 8-Speed Dual Clutch Automatic with manual shift

Price: $66,450

Competition: BMW M3, Mercedes C63 AMG, Audi RS4, Infiniti G37 Sedan, Cadillac CTS V

Review: Jeep Grand Cherokee Diesel

With the introduction of the updated 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee signaling in a new era for the Cherokee, I thought I’d take one last look Jeeps flagship for its last year of production. And while the new vehicle offers a fresh new look, it’s easy to say that the current Cherokee has withstood the test of time gracefully. It’s still a good, modern looking vehicle that will certainly appease the eye of customers well into its final stretch.

 

The vehicle I had in my possession was the CRD diesel powered Cherokee. And while the North American public comes to grips with the new influx of alternatively powered SUV’s currently flooding the market, the Cherokee CRD has been proving itself for some time now. A product of the short-lived Daimler-Chrysler project, the 3.0L Mercedes built diesel V-6 was one of the best outcomes of the doomed merger. Built in Berlin and benefiting from Mercedes’ Bluetec development, this common rail turbo diesel that is shared with Mercedes and Dodge Sprinter vans, represents the jewel of the Cherokee. Like most modern diesel powered SUV’s, you are treated to V-8 power and performance with the added bonus of V-6 Sedan fuel efficiency. Meantime, as part of the Bluetec R&D project, this engine purrs along quietly, emits no smoke under load and no sulfurous smell.

 

While Hybrids are making an impressive mark on the industry, these are the days of the diesel. The diesel advantage of power, handling, fuel efficiency and versatility so far out weigh the ever-advancing Hybrids. But who wants to take a hybrid off-road? Thus we have the Cherokee CRD, a vehicles who’s sole marketing is based around being a great kid and grocery hauler, while also being Trail Rated, and ready for anything the environment can throw at it.

 

While its on-road manners are a little on the soft and squishy side for me they are decent nonetheless. However it’s off-road where the Cherokee seems most at home, trudging up a mountainous trail. With a solid rear-end, Quadra-drive II 4WD system with electronic two-speed transfer gearbox and optional Limited Slip Diff in the rear, the Cherokee really does love to play in the dirt.

 

While the drivetrain, looks and abilities of the Cherokee CRD motivate to get out and have fun, the interior still leaves something to be desired. The over use of cheap plastics as well as the material used in the seats will have the driver constantly trying to not to slip out of place give the interior a low quality feel. As my vehicle came with a $53,000 price tag, I would have a hard time party with such expense. However, don’t let the price get you down. With Chrysler going into bankruptcy, and with only a year left until the new design starts showing up in showrooms, there are huge savings being passed on to the customers during these hard times. Pricing out this same vehicle can yield a $10,000 savings already. So that cheap looking interior isn’t looking so bad anymore is it?

 

Specs:

MSRP: $32,140

Price as tested: $52,195

Layout: Front Engine – 4WD

Engine: 3.0L V-6 Common Rail Turbo Diesel

Transmission: 5-Speed Automatic with 2-Speed Transfer case

HP: 215

Torque: 376

Brakes: 328 mm-front Disc – 320 mm rear Disc

Curb Weight: 4,724 kg

Towing Capacity: 3,500 kg

0-100 km/h: 7.5 sec

Fuel Economy (city/hwy): 12.0l/9.0L

Review: Infiniti FX50 - Intelligence Operative

Take one look at the all-new Infiniti FX50 and one thing becomes quickly apparent. It is a crossover that looks as though something ticked it off in a serious way. It’s a mean looking piece of machinery that’s for sure. Get in side and have a go at this 5.0L V8 packing beast and you’ll quickly find out that the FX’s bit is just as vicious as its bark. It is a high end, high tech machine that means business. 

 

Anyone who had the pleasure of driving the last generation FX will know that it was a vehicle designed for drivers. It changed the way everyone thought about a performance S- or in this case CUV. So Infiniti would have to dig deep to come up with a suitable replacement. Todays world has changed quite a bit since the introduction of the original FX, so some may wonder why Infiniti would be releasing a larger vehicle fitted with a larger more powerful engine? Well, this new engine manages to produce 70 more horsepower over the 4.5L while increasing fuel efficiency by 12%. This comes from the body going on a considerable diet consisting of Carbon Fibre, Aluminum and Composite panels, while aerodynamics have also been tweaked.

 

Much like a “drivers car,” this is a “drivers Crossover.” Yes, it sounds like an oxymoron, however the FX’s low and wide stance, makes for a good center of gravity, allowing the FX to corner fast and flat. Massive 21-inch tires available on the FX50 make this large crossover feel more like a Grand Tourer. Even sitting behind the wheel, the driver can easily forget they are driving a Crossover. New for this vehicle is a 7-speed automatic gearbox, with the same high quality paddle shifters found in the G37 S which give the same great throttle matching downshifts.

 

While the looks and driving esthetics scream sportscar, the FX is also a top player when it comes to features. This new FX is overflowing with electronic driving aids, all to improve performance and keep the occupants safe. The list reads like that of a quartermasters inventory with enough acronyms to please a General. Intelligent AWD, Intelligent Cruise Control, Intelligent Brake assist, Lane Departure…… The list is endless. To the point where you could think that the vehicle was designed for you specifically by “Q” for use in secret agent activities. 

 

So what does it all do? Well other than a constant barrage of beeps and pinging every time you do something the FX doesn’t like, it warns the driver of impending doom, and if the driver is not alert enough, the vehicle will take appropriate action such as putting negative force on the throttle pedal, applying the brakes or even using brake distribution to encourage the vehicle back into its lane if wandering occurs. The FX will not drive itself, however it does aid the driver in making the correct course of actions.

 

The FX did to me what every other Infiniti has done. It pleasantly surprised me. Ideally I prefer a vehicle more mechanical then electronic, however the FX made up for this with an excellent seating position, sporty steering wheel, impressive performance and great new look. Well great except for those headlights that is.

Review: Ford Fusion Hybrid

While last year seemed to be the year of big horsepower, 2009 is turning out to be the year of efficiency. Last year saw the C63 AMG, the BMW M3, the Lexus IS-F, and Dodges return muscle car, the Challenger SRT/8 all jump onto the scene. All packing big power pumping V8’s that suck fuel with little regard for the record high prices that flashed across the station pumps when we frequented last summer. It’s now 2009 and the automotive marketing machine has reefed up on the hand brake and all of a sudden we are rapidly traveling in a new direction. New on the scene this year is the Honda Insight, Cadillac Escalade Hybrid, as well as diesels for the 335 and X5 models over at BMW. Toyota will also soon be introducing a new Prius and as well as a new Lexus hybrid. The theme this year is definitely the efficient use of fuels. And now Ford has introduced the all-new Fusion hybrid to the eco family.

 

Now to be perfectly honest, I’ve never really been a lover of the new Ford look, however over the last little while, they have really put an effort on organizing a brand design that is distinctive to the blue oval, all starting with the original Fusion. And while the big bling chrome gates mounted to Ford grilles still raise one of my eyebrows, I must admit I’ve really fallen for the Fusions new look. And it wasn’t something I needed to get used too, I liked it right off the bat, from the first photographic glimpse.

 

The unknown was the interior design, another Ford trait I don’t always agree with. Long and behold, as soon as my but sank into the black leather seats, I was sold yet again. The entire interior has a great modern design; that like the exterior, exudes some European influences. But the piece de resistance has to be the gauge cluster. While many concept cars use interactive computer graphics in the design of their gauges, they never make it to production, usually due to cost. Well Ford made it work, as the hybrids fully interactive and entertaining gauge system entices the driver to drive as efficiently as possible, while the read-outs shine back in the best resolution graphics I’ve ever seen in an automobile.

 

Like the Insight Mr. Frechette was talking about earlier, the Fusion try’s to make driving sensibly, fun. One such function built into the gauge cluster is the overall efficiency rating. The cleaner one drives the Fusion, the more leaves appear on a growing vine next to the fuel level. Drive efficiently, and you are rewarded with up to 23 leaves on the dash-based foliage. Drive poorly, and the leaves begin to disappear. Although, if you are a technically driven person, the gauge can be changed to a traditional bar graph with exact numbers. But what fun is a bar graph?

 

During the press launch in Quebec City, we were sent out in the hybrid versions on a challenge. To follow a determined route, and get the best possible fuel economy we could. The route wound us through the narrow, steep and stop sign riddled streets of Quebec’s old city, and other than a about 15km on the free flowing highways, the 48 km route was mostly urban. Now I love a good challenge, but after all the honking, slow driving and fuel saving tactics, I was about ready to shoot myself in the face. However, the 5.6L/100 km rating we received literally had me astonished, let alone the 4.5L rating one of my colleges received, to win the competition.

Tech wise, besides the ultra cool gauge display, the Fusion comes equipped with side and rear sensing radar to detect obstacles in the vehicles blind spots. Unlike the mirror mounted sensors used by Volvo and Mazda, the Fusion’s radar is hidden behind the rear fenders, thus not giving the phantom signals you get with the other two units when driving in rain or snow.

 

So how is it to drive? Common feeling today is that hybrids just aren’t any fun to drive, and lets face it, there is a reason why. They’re single minded purpose to just offering the best possible fuel efficiency leaves the power and handling of the vehicle much to be desired, even with a fun game to make it less painful. Well the Fusion seems to be breaking those stereotypes, with a combined 191 hp the Fusion gets up a going respectably. The damping in the car is also impressive as it handles like mid-sized sedan should. The hybrid version of the Fusion is 124 kg heavier then the regular 2.5L SE, but unlike smaller hybrids that feel like light cars carrying an overweight elephant in the back, the Fusion is naturally a heavier car so the extra weight and unbalance goes unnoticed.

 

What really sets the Fusion apart is the operation of the electric assist. Tucked into the transaxle is a 106 hp electric unit that is linked to both the eCVT transmission and Atkinson Cycle 2.5L 4-cylinder. The computer that runs the whole deal, will shut the engine down at stops, and will allow the driver to drive within the electric threshold all the way to 75 km/h, with help from the dash display. This allows the driver to make the most of the electric drive train, using as little fuel as possible. It really is a great system, and coupled to an impressive car, the new Fusion should help keep Ford ahead of its rivals.

 

 

Specs:

MSRP: $27,270

Price as tested: $30,235

Layout: Front engine – Front wheel drive

Engine: 2.5L Atkinson cycle with electric Hybrid assist

Transmission: Electronically controlled CVT

HP: 191 combined

Torque: 136

Brakes: Regenerative braking plus four-wheel disc

Curb Weight: 1,687 kg

Towing Capacity: NA

0-100 km/h: 8.7 sec

Fuel Economy (city/hwy): 4.6/5.4L/100km

Review: BMW X5 - Same X5 without the Spark Plugs

Late November 2007, I found myself lapping BMW’s performance driving Centre in the driving rain behind the wheel of the all-new BMW X5. With one of the head engineers guiding me around the track, he claimed to me that this new “SAV” or Sports Activity Vehicle as BMW insist on calling it, could handle a corner as well as its 3-Series sibling. After about ten laps I believed him, with the aid of the direct injected 4.8L V8 heaving the 2,380 kg SAV out of the corner with the utmost of ferocity. As a performance car enthusiast, I’ve never really been a big fan of this segment of vehicle, but the new X5 gave a good smack in the face that told me a versatile vehicle can also be fun to drive.

 

It was at this global launch that BMW teased us with the diesel version as the European media were also in attendance. While the gasoline powered X5’s impressed, the diesel powered version had me quite intrigued, although at the time, there were no plans to bring the diesel to North America. Truth of the mater is that North American’s (mostly American’s) just don’t like diesel vehicles, unless it’s a work truck. Well a lot has changed in the last couple years. Fuel prices along with environmental and economic concerns means that people are now looking to spend their money in a much smarter way. And thus the market is beginning to look at diesel in a whole new way.

 

And so we have it, the X5 diesel is here, now named the BMW X5 xDrive35d. Yup it’s a mouth full. This new line in the X5 breed features BMW’s award winning 3.0L Turbocharged straight six with the new BluePerformance Advance Diesel technology. So, what is BluePerformance, and what does it mean to you? Well this technology will likely make you think diesel rather than buying a smaller gasoline powered car.

 

BluePerformance is BMW’s result from the Bluetec development project. This was the research into making diesel technology cleaner and more socially acceptable. In other words, you get a diesel-powered vehicle with excellent mileage, huge power, with out the noise, smoke or smell of a conventional diesel powered vehicle. This done by utilizing direct injection from its common rail-type fuel system that contains fuel pressurized to 1,600 bar or 26,000 psi. Two turbochargers, mounted sequentially, keep turbo lag at a minimum while providing effortless power throughout the rev range, and giving the mid-size vehicle 265 horsepower and a massive 425 foot pounds of torque to complete the performance side of the equation.

 

On the environmental side, the diesels exhaust uses urea injection to lower NOX emissions. After being injected into the exhaust gasses, the urea solution creates ammonia that then converts the nitric oxides (NOX) in the exhaust into environmentally friendly nitrogen and water vapor. Like similar systems, the urea supply must be refilled occasionally, however, by equipping the X5d with 23 litres of urea capacity in a pair of tanks, one of which is heated to ensure a fluid urea solution in temperatures below -11 degree’s Celsius, BMW has managed to fit the urea refilling periods within the standard scheduled maintenance stops, and will cover the cost of the refills and solution for the first four years or 80,000 kilometers.

 

 So all this technical talk is all well and good, but does it make diesel a more seductive fuel alternative. In a word, yes! The result is that you have a vehicle with all the versatility of an SUV, the class and handling of a performance luxury sedan, the power of a large V8 matched with the economy of a small V6 sedan. I don’t know about you, but that sounds like a winning combination to me. And that’s exactly how it feels on the road.

 

The sheer amount of low-end torque means both nipping around town and passing on the highway are near effortless and more civilized acts. While a gasoline powered vehicle requires down-shifts to put the vehicle in the needed power band and the engine revs hard to pull you past slower traffic. With the diesel, you only have to press the throttle, and allow the momentum of torque thrust you forward. When matched to the xDrive AWD drivetrain, the usefulness of all this low down torque made the X5 surprisingly competent off the beaten path. The xDrive system includes a centre diff with a collection of clutch packs to provide torque to either front or rear axles, with a static distribution of 60% rear, 40% front, and the capacity to send full power to either end. With the DSC on, traction was maximized, and the lack of wheel spin got the BMW up a steep and slippery grade with ease. Conversely, with the DSC off, the diesel’s low-range torque and excellent six-speed automatic transmission kept the wheels spinning to power out of sticky situations. For a full report of how the X5 compared to its luxury SUV competition in off-road conditions, be sure to check out the Spring issue of Trucks Plus Magazine.

 

The only downside that I personally found with the diesel, was that it wasn’t gasoline. I love a great sounding engine, and the BMW straight-six does play a magical tune. Also, I love shifting gears and playing in the rev band, and you really just don’t need to with this vehicle. So, the diesel is almost too efficient for me, as high revving and gearshifts are simply not needed. For the average consumer looking at getting into an X5, this will likely not be a problem, and to be honest something I can easily live with.